The Need for Trees
Many climate
activists reading this column will warn me this subject can be a dangerous
distraction. They are correct if my readers think planting trees alone will
solve the climate crisis.
As a bare minimum, society must transition away from
primitive fossil fuels to modern clean energy. No one should view tree planting
as a single climate fix. This column assumes we can muster the collective will
power, in other words the moral courage, to make the switch to clean power. Pursuing
this is job #1.
Additionally, we would
be wise to enlist Mother Nature in the fight. Trees are a Nature Based Solution
(NBS) as they naturally pull CO2 out the air and lock it up.
World-wide
we lose 13 billion trees a year and only regain half of them. This is because
trees are often replaced by pasture for cattle or cropland to feed cattle. If
you know the carbon math of beef you understand what a disaster it is. I
encourage you to switch to a healthier plant-based diet and go light on the
dead cow.
To avert
disaster, scientists have calculated we need to plant 1 billion hectares of
land in trees. In a more familiar land
unit, this is 247,105,163,015 acres of forest planting. This goal is a pursued world-wide
effort. Some countries are already
planting. For example, it is reported one Turkish town proudly planted a record
303,153 trees in an hour while in one day 23 million Ethiopians planted 350
million trees.
Surveys
indicate we, in the USA, could plant 60 billion trees by reforestation,
afforestation, restocking understocked federal lands, advantageously planting
trees on pasture and agricultural lands, and planting in urban areas.
Unfortunately,
trees do not give us a carbon payoff immediately or even quickly. The growth
curve of trees varies species to species and in general the curve is sigmoidal. The rate of growth measured by volume is important. Juveniles are slow volume
growers. While young trees may be growing up at an astonishingly fast rate, they
simply aren’t big enough to pack on the carbon pounds. When they reach
adolescence at ten to twenty years their carbon appetite accelerates, and they
fill out packing on 40 pounds of carbon a year and continue at this pace for
many years sometimes centuries before their growth volume tapers off.
How can we
dramatically speed this process? This column will look back in American history
for lessons from the past while the next column will look forward to new solutions.
In the
1930’s, to repair some areas environmentally damaged, and to put young men to
work, the Federal Government created the Civilian Conservation Corp. The CCC,
often called by its nickname the Tree Army, was the most popular depression era
program developed to keep young men employed and money flowing to their
families. Many beautiful stands of giant trees we appreciate today were planted
in the 1930’s by the CCC. At its height, the CCC employed 300,000 young men.
While the Corp had many conservation goals the one it focused on was tree
planting. In conjunction with conservation projects the human goals were to
improve young men’s physical fitness, improve morale, and increase the
employment potential of men. Employers did respond as a person who has
demonstrated he or she can put in a tough day’s work is a valuable asset.
Can we do
this today? The men of the CCC earned 30 dollars a month. Thirty-five bucks does not sound like much
but in today’s dollars it is $590. OK, that is not much either. But there was another
requirement to join the CCC, one we might find infringing on our freedom. Of
the 30 dollars a man earned 25 of it had to go to his family back home. Hard physical
work, for a small paycheck, with most of his paycheck going home might not
sound like a great new deal. Yet,
despite this, or maybe because of our citizen’s sense of joint sacrifice it was
the most popular federal program in its day.
Can we do the
physical work to create the new forest lands? There will be a need for manual
work and human workers. Do we underestimate our ability to do hard work? Obviously
young men and women enter our armed forces every day in less than sterling
shape and graduate from boot camp leaner and stronger. The answer is yes, we
can.
One example
we might look to is Europe’s current farm labor shortage. Europe’s guest
workers cannot enter countries like France and England due to the pandemic. England and France have put out requests for
citizen laborers and, so far, the requests are being met with enthusiasm
despite paying only minimum wage.
Is there an example of this sense of sacrifice
for country and family today? You do not have to look any further than our medical
professionals and other essential workers putting their lives on the line
fighting COVID-19. Americans rise to the challenge if we understand the
consequences of action. We did it in the 30s, during WWII, today, and we will
soon meet the challenge of climate change if we are brave enough to understand
the science.
Can we kick
our fossil fuel addiction and plant enough trees? Those were some big numbers I
threw at you making the goal seem unattainable. But next week I will, as I have
in the past, introduce you to leading edge scientists and entrepreneurs whose
vision and dedication will change the world for the better making massive tree
planting a reality…if we support them with a modern high tech tree army.
* If you
would like to get ahead of me search out the Canadian Company, Flash Forest.
Comments
Post a Comment